Stoke Local AGM & Leaflets 26th July ’14

New from Stokey Local:

Stokey Local are holding a meeting at on Saturday 26 July, 4pm at the Methodist Church, 106 Stoke Newington High Street (next door to the Sainsbury’s Local store) and have a new leaflet to distribute.

This meeting will serve several functions: an update on progress, an organising meeting, an opportunity to review our fundraising and it will also be the first formal AGM of the ‘Stokey Local Community Fund’. Once the business of the meeting is out of the way, it will also provide an opportunity for an informal get together

Perhaps most importantly, it will be an opportunity to organise the distribution of a campaign newsletter (pictured below). We need volunteers to help distribute this A4 newsletter as we still need to raise additional funds for the legal costs (mindful that if we do not win, then we will have to pay a contribution to the Council, and developer’s legal costs, as well as other court and professional costs). We also want to be genuinely representative of the whole community, and not just the ‘vocal pressure group’ as characterised by some of our critics.

The leaflets will be available to collect at our meeting this Saturday 26 July at 4pm at the Methodist Church, 106 Stoke Newington High Street (next door to the Sainsbury local store).

 We need volunteers both to deliver the A4 newsletter, and to co-ordinate the delivery in different parts of the area (to avoid leafleting the same street twice). If you can help, please sign up here. We are looking for as many people as possible to take about 250 copies each, which should take about an hour to distribute door to door. With enough volunteers we can get the area covered, which will raise the profile of this campaign once again, and ensure we are ready for the court battle in October.

The meeting will also be the formal AGM of the Stokey Local Community Fund (which is entirely focused on raising funds for the legal challenge and is constituted separately from the campaign group)

We established our fighting fund last year and appointed a number of respected local people to act as Trustees.

The primary object of the fund is:

  • To indemnify such complainants, respondents and defendants as it agrees in matters challenging development in Wilmer Place, N16.

Since then more than 300 people have donated money. To ensure accountability, we are holding a brief AGM, where a set of accounts will be available and where we will elect Trustees for the coming year.

Spread the word
We will keep you updated, but in the meantime, feel free to share this newsletter with friends, family, neighbours etc, and share it on Facebook/Twitter etc.

Finally
If you are not already on our direct email list, then you can sign up here to receive regular updates:

As always: thank you Stokey!
 

 

Just when you though it was safe….Neighbourhood Forum back on agenda

Last year, the Council rejected two competing applications for a neighbourhood forum in the Stamford Hill area.We opposed both forums at the time as we believe that planning is too controversial and divisive an issue in this part of Hackney, and that there is no community consensus about what planning policy should look like in this area.

unnamed In December 2013 we heard that former Conservative Councillor Linda Kelly was once again seeking to exploit community tensions over planning by resubmitting her application to have the Council devolve planning to a ‘forum’ that she has established. Jonathan Freedland has previously written about his concerns about the impact on community relations if a neighbourhood forum is granted.

In response to the Kelly bid, some members of the community have submitted an alternative proposed forum which stresses the need for any changes to be made by consensus. So there are now two competing applications: Hackney Planning Watch opposes both. 

The Council has now begun consultation on this second application. All the documents, for both applications, can be seen here. The latest application is at the top (under ‘application documents’), and the one from Linda Kelly’s group is at the bottom (under ‘previous application documents’).

We will be most effective if we write individual letters/emails, we are therefore urging our supporters to write to the Council, ldf@hackney.gov.uk  with the title: ‘Central Stamford Hill neighbourhood forum’ and ask the council to reject both proposals.

We are also asking you to complete our petition.

Let people know
With just a few weeks until the Council consultation closes we need to alert our community to the divisive threat that one or other of these forums is granted power to write planning policies for the area. If you are willing to help us distribute a leaflet across the area, please email planningwatch@btinternet.com

Can you also please forward this email on to friends and neighbours. Please ask them to sign the petition.

Sign up to our newsletters
If you would like to join Hackney Planning Watch’s email list, please sign up here.

Please sign our petition and ensure that inappropriate over-development is not given a free reign in the area.

Many thanks for your support

Planning Watch

Sainsbury’s Wilmer Place Judicial Review 2!

Stokey Local have announced that last Monday 19th May 2014, at the Royal Courts of Justice, the first hearing took place relating to the judicial review of the Council’s decision to grant planning permission for the Sainsbury’s/Wilmer Place development.

Stokey Local goes on to say that originally, this was intended as a full hearing of the judicial review of the Council’s first decision to grant planning permission in August (JR1). However, after a number of legal arguments it was decided that it was best to use the time to address a range of procedural issues – including whether there is a case to answer on challenging the second decision (JR2) and if so, whether both cases should be heard together).

The case has been taken forward by Nick Perry, but he has the support of the community at large in seeking to prevent a development which actually reduces the number of “affordable” housing units on site, damages the biodiversity of Abney Park Cemetery and will undermine the viability of many of independent stores on the High Street and Church Street.

Thanks to the sterling efforts of our team of barristers (who are working on a ‘no win, no fee’ basis) we have been granted permission to proceed with the judicial review of the second planning permission (you may recall that the developer sought to outmanoeuvre JR1, by getting the Council to grant planning permission for a second identical application).

The permission judgment basically says that on all of the points we raised about the second planning permission, we have an ‘arguable’ point. It doesn’t mean we will necessarily win – the full court hearing will decide that – just that there is a case to be answered. That we have permission on all the points is very, very good news.

Given this decision, it is highly unlikely that the developer will now try the same trick of seeking a further grant of planning permission for the same development. The two Judicial Reviews will now be heard together and the lawyers will have to submit a revised set of court documents for the combined cases in the next few weeks. Then there will be one hearing on both Judicial Reviews, lasting two or three days, these are expected to take place 14, 15 and 16 October.

As Russell, our expert on biodiversity observed, it ‘means the site is safe for at least another summer (which the bees and other insects will appreciate)’. Of course, if we actually win the case, the site will be protected for a considerably longer period (although the developer could still submit a further application).

Procedural point on disclosure

We also asked the court to order the publication of the full financial viability statement ahead of the Judicial Review. This document was the developer’s justification for there being so few affordable units in their proposal. The Council accepted their arguments but refused to put the statement or its own analysis into the public domain; arguing that publication would jeopardise the developer’s ‘commercial confidentiality’. Our point is that if we don’t see it, we cannot effectively challenge it.

After lengthy reasoning and consideration, the court refused our request for disclosure on this point. In effect the judge ruled that this is a matter for the full hearing, rather than a preliminary stage. So our failure to win that point doesn’t necessarily affect the prospects of the Judicial Review. It just means we don’t have any specific ammunition on the validity or otherwise of the original viability statement. Our legal team (which includes the leading expert on information rights) are considering the possibility of appealing this point.

Separately the Council have undertaken an internal review and have concluded they were right not to release the info. We will be pressing the point formally with the Information Commissioner’s Office, as there are a number of cases that contradict this assertion.

The full judgment on the disclosure and permission on JR2 is available here. And the draft court order that is the output of all this is here.

Finances

We originally launched a financial appeal to support Nick’s efforts based on running one JR. While our barristers are working at no cost to our side (on a no-win, no-fee, basis), we still have to pay our solicitor’s fees and any costs for expert reports. The granting of permission to proceed with JR2, effectively means that we need to raise an additional £5,000 to ensure that if we lose (which is a possibility) then we will have sufficient funds to cover any award of costs against Nick.
Consequently, we now need to raise some more money. We are not at this stage asking those who have already donated to give more, rather we are encouraging those who have yet to make a donation to do so.

Many people have given £50, but every little helps, and it is only the widespread support of the community that has allowed us to get this far, and we now have a real chance to overturn the decision at Wilmer Place.

So if you have not donated yet, please consider making a donation now.

  • Account name: Stokey Local Community Fund
  • Sort code: 08-60-01
  • Account number: 20316473

Council elections

Stokey Local is not a party political group, we have enjoyed widespread support from across the political spectrum, but it is good to see that some of our allies have done particularly well in the recent elections. In Stoke Newington ward, Louisa Thompson, and Susan Fajana-Thomas (both Labour), two great advocates of our campaign were returned. Meanwhile Barry Buitekant (Labour) and Ian Sharer (Lib Dem) who consistently voted to oppose planning permission in the Planning Committee are also both back on the Council. The Green Party, which has been consistently supportive, also received substantial support (although no councillors) coming in second in numerous.

 

Review and next steps

At the moment, much of the action is taking place in terms of legal arguments about planning procedure, but over the next few weeks we will set up a meeting where we can consider what further steps we can take to unite the community and put pressure on the Council to adopt a better approach to planning in our area.

Now the elections are out of the way, we can consider lobbying the new faces in the Town Hall to get the planning department to be braver and think differently about how the Council can challenge developers.

Thanks for sticking with the campaign. Much still to do, and it wouldn’t surprise me if there are a few tricks and turns on the part of the developer and Council, before the substantive hearing of the Judicial Reviews.

Election Candidates Meetings

Hackney Unites is organising a series of public meetings where the community can put questions to the candidates.

Why not get along to one of these events and ask your questions (whether it is about planning, or any other matter).


Tonight, (Friday) at St John at Hackney Church, Lower Clapton Road, E5 0PD from 6:30pm to 8:30pm, where the focus will be on housing issues.

Next Wednesday 14 May, at St Michael & All Angels, Corner of Fontayne Road and Northwold Road, N16 7ED from 7pm to 9pm, with a particular focus on Cazenove Ward.

Next Thursday 15 May is the Mayoral Question Time from 6:30pm to 8:30pm in the Council Chamber of Hackney Town Hall, Mare Street. If you wish to participate in this meeting you will need to pre-register given the high level of interest, if your name is not on the list then you will not be able to get in.

News Round Up – Second Judicial Review for Wilmer Place

It’s ‘game on’ for the second Judicial Review!

Last Friday, 14 March, Nick Perry’s legal team served a ‘pre-action protocol’ letter on the Council. This gives the Council legal notice of the intention to serve a new Judicial Review on their second attempt to grant planning permission for the Wilmer Place Sainsbury’s development.

Congratulations and many thanks to the legal team for all their work, and of course to Nick, for all the hard work. See Stokey Local for more details.


What happens now?


Well the Council could, in theory, ‘consent’ to the challenge, but this is not likely. We are asking that the first and second Judicial Reviews be joined together and heard together. If this happens, then we should know in May whether the planning decision was lawful or not. It is obviously in everyone’s interest to know one way or the other, whether the decision was legitimate, so the Council may agree to joining the two cases. If they do not, then the first Judicial Review (JR1) will be heard in May. Stokey Local is relatively confident that they will be successful, but it will all depend on how the judge views the issues on the day. If JR1 is lost, then the developer has planning permission and JR2 becomes irrelevant. If however, JR1 wins, then the first decision is null and void, and all will hinge on JR2. Unless the two cases are joined, it is likely to take another six months before JR2 gets to a hearing.

If we win JR1 and JR2, then the developer is back to square one and will need to make a fresh planning application. They may of course choose to submit a further identical application and hope that the Council can ‘go through the motions’ of giving it appropriate consideration. However, by then we will have had a series of elections and we may find that the composition of the planning committee has changed. Equally, this time, we may be able to persuade our local MP to support a ‘call in’. So potentially it will be a long campaign; there may even be a JR3!

Dalston

The people of Dalston are organising to maximise the benefit for the community of the redevelopment of Kingsland Shopping centre (no one is actually against the redevelopment, but they want to see real benefits for the community, and the preservation of the Eastern Curve Garden). There is a petition that you may wish to sign, and which you can help publicise.

Last week a decision at Planning Sub-committee to demolish the last historic vestiges of Dalston Lane Terrace, and rebuild them in a modern ‘heritage likeness’, was passed on the casting vote of the Chair. It has been a hugely unpopular decision in the borough and the campaign to Save Dalston Lane is facing many of the same, difficult decisions as Stokey Local right now. If you want to stay in touch with the issue, two groups are leading the charge: @SaveDaltsonLane on Twitter, and OPEN Dalston.

#hackneyspeaks
Hackney Unites are seeking to organise a range of ‘hustings’ meetings in the run up to the Council elections in May.  This will be an opportunity for the community to put questions to the candidates. It might be an idea to do this in Stoke Newington? For more details see here.

For more info, or to volunteer, to help, you can contact La Toyah onlmcallister.jones@gmail.com

 

 

North Hackney Neighbourhood Forum(s) Update

This is a brief update on the campaign to stop the outsourcing of planning policy in the north of the borough to an unelected and unaccountable neighbourhood forum.
Last year, the Council rejected two competing applications for a neighbourhood forum in the Stamford Hill area.

We opposed both forums as we believe that: planning is too controversial and divisive an issue in this part of Hackney and that there is no community consensus about what planning policy should look like.

In December we heard that Conservative Councillor (and Hackney Mayoral candidate) Linda Kelly was once again seeking to exploit community tensions over planning to further her own political ambitions. She had submitted an almost identical application to the one that was rejected last year, presumably in the belief that the community objections would be less strong and that the Council could be ‘worn down’ by repeated applications.

In response, some members of the community have submitted an alternative proposed forum which stresses the need for any changes to be made by consensus. So there are now two competing applications: Hackney Planning Watch opposes both.

The Council will now consult on the second, but to avoid becoming embroiled in politics the council cannot begin the consultation until after the May elections.  Given that there will be an eight-week consultation period and the Cabinet does not meet in September, realistically, the issue is not now likely to come up for decision until October.

This means that our main activity at the present time will be to continue to promote our petition.

We are also interested in holding a community discussion about planning and the needs of the community in Stamford Hill. We have a number of planning academics who are prepared to work with us: this may be a way of moving towards a greater understanding of the diverse needs of the community. If you are interested in getting involved in organising this please let us know: planningwatch@btinternet.com

Sainsburys/Wilmer Place development

The Sainsbury/Wilmer Place development has been granted planning permission. However, Stokey Local and the lawyers are pouring over the decision to see whether there is scope for a second judicial review. More details will follow in about three weeks time.

Dalston Eastern Curve Garden Pre-Application Meeting

Tuesday 25 February 2014, 6.30pm Stoke Newington town Hall Church Street N16 0JR
There is a pre-application meeting on Tuesday (25th) where the council planning committee will explore proposals for the redevelopment of the Kingsland Shopping Centre in Dalston. Most people welcome the redevelopment of the site, but are concerned about the potential loss of the Eastern Curve Garden, lack of affordable homes, and question what benefits there will be (particularly relating to training and employment) for the local community. More details here: https://tinyurl.com/nqcfdwj

Let people know
Can you please forward this email on to friends and neighbours. Please ask them to sign the petition.

Sign up to our newsletters
If you would like to join Hackney Planning Watch’s email list, please sign up.

Please sign our petition and ensure that inappropriate over-development is not given a free reign in the area.

Many thanks for your support

Help stop an unelected forum: please sign our petitition

Last year you supported a petition to stop Hackney Council devolving planning policy to an unelected and unaccountable ‘forum’. Unfortunately Conservative Councilor Linda Kelly and her group are once again seeking to exploit community divisions over planning for political gain. They have resubmitted their application and consequently we must demonstrate that the community does not support their proposals.

It would help greatly if you could sign a new petition:

In July 2013 the Council concluded: ‘There are deep-seated divisions within the community in this part of Hackney on planning issues’ and ‘Designating a forum in these circumstances would not enhance community relations in the area and will not improve social cohesion’.

Jonathan Freedland writing in the Jewish Chronicle said: “I don’t want to see a system that pits strictly Orthodox Jews against everyone else.” Nor do we.

Nothing has changed since then and the Council should reject the latest attempt to impose a divisive, forum. If you agree with us, please sign the petition and encourage friends and neighbours to do the same.

Thank you for your continued support.

Hackney Planning Watch